Yes, and by default they are -- client and brand identity is removed unless a client explicitly approves being named. A case study is only published once the client has confirmed the wording, metrics, and anonymization level.

Yes. Dashboards pull data from Seller Central, Walmart Seller Center, and other sources into one view built around the specific metrics a team actually needs to act on, rather than a generic template.

Yes. Funds are usually withheld after a suspension, a reserve policy change, or an account-level hold. Selleroot reviews the specific reason cited for the hold and the account's disbursement history to build the release case, rather than submitting a generic funds-request ticket.

Yes. Walmart account setup, catalog requirements, and content standards differ meaningfully from Amazon's, so expansion is scoped as its own launch rather than a copy-paste of an existing Amazon catalog.

Yes. Section 3 enforcement covers inauthentic, counterfeit, IP, and related-policy issues, and Amazon expects a different kind of evidence than a standard performance appeal -- invoices, authorization letters, and a clear supply chain. Selleroot reviews what evidence actually exists before drafting the response.

Yes. This covers trademark and brand ownership verification, catalog control issues, and unauthorized-listing disputes -- areas where Brand Registry status directly affects what enforcement action is even possible to appeal.

Yes. Invoices, letters of authorization, and supplier records are checked for the specific details Amazon cross-references -- matching product identifiers, dates, and quantities -- before they become part of an appeal, so gaps get caught before submission instead of after a rejection.

No. AI assists with organizing data, drafting, and surfacing patterns, but account strategy and any submission that goes to a marketplace requires accountable human review before it's sent -- high-impact actions are never automated end-to-end.

Yes. This covers titles, images, backend search terms, and category/attribute accuracy -- the combination that affects both search visibility and conversion, reviewed together rather than as separate one-off fixes.

Yes. A related-account flag usually comes from a shared device, IP address, payment method, or business detail linking two accounts. Selleroot maps the actual connection Amazon is citing and builds the case for why the accounts should be treated as separate, rather than a generic denial.

Yes. Walmart Seller Center has its own performance standards, deactivation triggers, and appeal process, separate from Amazon's. Selleroot reviews the actual Walmart notice rather than applying an Amazon-style response to a Walmart-specific issue.

Use the audit-request form on the Contact page, or book a time directly on Calendly -- both are linked from every "Request Free Account Audit" button on the site.

Weekly for accounts with active risk signals (recent warnings, policy strikes, or rapid catalog changes); monthly as a baseline for stable accounts. Amazon's own account health dashboard updates frequently enough that a quarterly check tends to miss early warning signs.

As soon as the notice arrives, ideally within 24 hours. Amazon and Walmart both track response time as part of the case record, and evidence is easiest to gather while the account activity is still recent. Waiting to "figure it out first" is the most common reason an appeal ends up thin on evidence.

A strategy-level review of growth, catalog, and expansion decisions -- where consulting stops short of day-to-day account management and instead focuses on the direction and priority calls a seller's team then executes.

A structured review across account health, catalog quality, and documentation readiness that flags what's likely to trigger enforcement before it happens, instead of reacting after a suspension notice arrives.

A review of current account health metrics, policy areas the account is exposed on, documentation that would be needed if a claim came in tomorrow, and a prioritized list of what to fix first based on what's most likely to trigger enforcement.

Recurring reporting, catalog update pipelines, and account-health alerting are the most common candidates -- work that's repetitive, rule-based, and currently eating hours that could go toward strategy instead. Automation here is delivered as a managed service, not sold as standalone software.

Do not resubmit a rejected appeal with only minor wording changes -- Amazon can see the full appeal history and a near-duplicate reads as ignoring the reviewer's feedback. Also avoid generic apology language with no root-cause explanation or corrective action; reviewers are specifically looking for what changed operationally, not regret.

The United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and India -- each reviewed for the specific product eligibility, tax, and fulfillment requirements of that market rather than a single generic expansion checklist.